EUROPEAN TOYS

  

 
 
CAR SEARCH RESULTS

 

Supermini
Make and model Adult Child Pedestrian Compare
Smart logotype Smart City Coupe (2000)
***
 
**
Smart logotype Smart ForFour (2005)
****
**
*
Smart logotype Smart ForTwo (2007)
****
 
**

 

smart fortwo 2007 (451)

Smart ForTwo
RATING
SCORE
   
ADULT OCCUPANT
****
28
Front: 13
Side: 14
 
Seatbelt reminder: 1
Pole: 0
 
PEDESTRIAN
**
10
   

 

Adult occupant protection
Frontal impact driver
Frontal impact driver
Frontal impact passenger
Frontal impact passenger
Side impact driver
Side impact driver

Child restraints
18 month old Child Not applicable
3 year old Child Not applicable
Pedestrian protection
Pedestrian protection
Pedestrian protection

Safety equipment
Front seatbelt pretensioners
Front seatbelt load limiters
Driver frontal airbag
Front passenger frontal airbag
Side body airbags
Side head airbags
Driver knee airbag
Car details
Tested model smart fortwo, 999cc "passion", LHD
Body type 2 door
Year of publication 2007
Kerb weight 750kg
VIN from which rating applies applies to all fortwos

Comments
Front impact
The passenger cell remained stable during the impact. Structures in the dashboard presented a risk of injury to the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger.

Side impact
The dummy's head contacted the rubber window trim on the cant rail, leading to a high deceleration. However, the data recorded by the dummy suggested an adequate level of head protection. A side impact airbag to protect the chest and the head is available as an option but was not fitted to the test vehicle.

Child-protection
There are no rear seats in the smart fortwo so child protection was not rated. An option package is available from smart which includes ISOFIX anchorages for the passenger seat and a switch to disable the passenger's side frontal airbag. The label warning of the dangers of fitting a rearward facing child restraint without first disabling the airbag was inadequate.

Pedestrian protection
The bumper scored maximum points for the protection it offered to pedestrians' legs. However, the front edge of the bonnet scored no points and those areas which might be struck by pedestrians' heads were rated as predominantly poor.